|
Endless
POFibilities -- June 1999
Highlights from the Advocacy Session
at The First Premature Ovarian Failure Conference held
October 24, 1998. Presented by Karen Hendricks, JD, Assistant
Director, Dept. of Government Liaison, American Academy of
Pediatrics. Member, Executive Committee Friends of NICHD Coalition.
I have a fairly short period of time and what I would like
to do is start with a general question so I can get a sense
of your lobbying IQ, and your advocacy IQ. How many of you
have ever met with your member of Congress and/or Senator
or a State legislator (counting – a few hands)? We are
going to have to work on that. OK, how many of you, OK, this
is one I can get you on, perhaps more of you have done this,
have ever written a letter to the editor of a newspaper or
magazine. If it’s the same people, don’t raise
your hands (counting – better). OK, here’s another
one: how many of you have ever, while you are hanging out
in your kitchen watching C-Span like most of us do here inside
the beltway, have you ever called in to C-Span or called in
to a radio show. (One woman raised her hand to all). You,
young woman, quite the advocate. OK, better. Well that gives
me some sense of where all of you are, politically and legislatively
and I don’t mean politically by your party because that
really is irrelevant. The issue is how much of an advocate
and activist you are. Then I will start with this really simple
definition of advocacy. It is probably something that all
of you do and you just don’t call it advocacy or you
don’t call it necessarily lobbying. In its simplest
form, advocacy is to speak up, to plead the case for another,
or to champion a particular cause. That is pretty much the
textbook definition. It is something we do routinely, but
we don’t really think about it as advocacy. What I will
try and do in the time that we have is to lay out a variety
of legislative strategies, but more importantly, advocacy
strategies because there are multiple strategies to advocacy
and I don’t want you to think that it is only dealing
in the legislative process at all.
To be an advocate or, in my instance, to be a lobbyist for
the American Academy of Pediatrics, it runs the gamut from
writing letters, we do voter education, filing lawsuits (something
we have done in the past), testifying before a legislative
body or before a regulatory body or commission. This is both
in the state and federal level. I know the federal level best
because that’s what I do here, so most of my remarks
will reflect on the federal level. But they are absolutely
applicable to the state level and when I can and when I do
remember, I’ll make sure I invoke the state level as
well. Advocacy is also conducting and utilizing public opinion
polls and public opinion data and we have obviously seen a
fair amount of that over these last several weeks whether
it’s who is running for governor of your state, what
congressional person is running against someone else, or my
personal favorite, the impeachment. So we have seen a whole
gamut of public opinion polls and data. Advocacy also is that
personal visit and I am going to spend a little time on that:
that visit with a legislator and/or your governor. It is also
editorial boards and meeting with editorial boards of major
newspapers, hometown newspapers, your small community newspapers
as well. It is drafting up opinion statements as well. There
are a whole host of examples (in the handout materials that
were distributed) of a sample letter to the editor, an editorial,
a whole host of things so you can get a sense of what we are
talking about.
I would like to first start out with a few guiding principles
to give you some context. And first and foremost for some
of us who have been doing this for a long time we don’t
really think about the fear factor, of meeting with a member
of Congress or with a governor, or even calling their office
for something. My first principle for all of you is, don’t
be afraid. You must keep in mind that, one, you are a constituent,
and as a constituent you are a taxpayer and you vote, and
there is a level of accountability that our legislators have
to us as citizens. In my work it is often our own pediatricians
who get a little nervous when we are sending them up to the
Hill on something. But again, my first principle is just don’t
be afraid. Just go out there and do it. Obviously, probably
the hardest and yet the easiest thing to do is that first
face to face meeting with a legislator, and/or his staff.
That is probably one of the most effective advocacy tools,
but as I said at the outset, it is not the only one. Your
task with respect to the issue that is most important to you,
all of you here, is very simple. It is to inform and persuade
that legislator why your position is correct, why there is
a need for more funding for medical research, why there is
a need for more funding on women’s health, or further
investigation on health care in general, any of a number of
issues, however you want to frame your issue. That is the
right issue. That is the right position that you are taking.
Probably one of the more difficult things is to try and get
a little bit of homework first, to have some sense of who
the policy maker is, what issues are on his or her agenda
that are relevant to or why you are going in to visit, or
why you are writing a letter, and some issues may have a direct
correlation while others do not, but you are often able to
make a segue. You may know that there is a member of Congress
here in this community (talking about Virginia), Representative
Jim Moran who is a great advocate on pediatric research because
his youngest daughter had cancer. Well, there is a segue.
There is an interest in research, and you can make some other
analogies with other members of Congress as well as your governors.
A few other things to consider that are reasonable to know
and not hard to find out: has that particular legislator had
a personal experience Is it something that their spouse, their
daughter, their daughter-in-law, their granddaughter, their
son-in-law, whatever. Is there some relative, or is it that
person, him or herself that may influence the way they think
about a particular issue. Quite often it is the personal hands-on
experience that colors the way a member of Congress or a State
legislator might think. With an extraordinary number of women
coming into Congress and coming into other elective positions
throughout the state, family issues and so called women’s
issues are taking a front and center position. Something that
we haven’t seen in quite some time so the climate is
fairly good. You’ve got a wonderful window of opportunity
and I would strongly encourage you to pursue that.
Moving from the general to the specific, let me spend just
a couple of minutes on what is probably the more intimidating
experience that is the actual visit and sitting down after
you have made the phone call and arranged to meet with a member
of Congress and his or her staff.
There are a few things to keep in mind, and again, there
is some material in your handout that lay out some of these
points. You need to go in and make your presentation and this
would be true just as if you were on the telephone calling
a staff person or calling your legislator, or calling a member
of Congress. You need to be simple, you need to be brief,
and you need to be straightforward. They don’t have
a lot of time. The notion of saying, "it’s simple,
stupid, " is a really a good thing because their IQ is
often a little short on your subject matter. They may be really
smart on defense issues but you are not coming in there to
talk about defense issues at all. You don’t want to
get too detailed or too technical. Listening to Dr. Nelson
this morning, I thought "Oh, this is way over my head."
And a few times I was also able to think "Oh yeah, I
get it." You don’t want to go to any meeting with
the Albert Einstein lecture. You really just want to just
provide the facts. Tell your story. That’s something
we tell our pediatricians all the time. Tell your story. Why
is it important? Most staff and most members of Congress are
dealing with and clearly on the state level as well, dealing
with 10, 12, 15 burning issues. Every member of Congress has
to vote on a particular issue. Every state legislator has
to vote on a particular issue, so they don’t really
have time to be really smart. So provide them with a short,
preferably a one-page concise fact sheet, in plain English,
that adds to their knowledge base, something that they can
use in the future, something that can be used. Often times,
when the member of Congress is on the floor making a statement,
you or another constituent will have provided them that information,
those facts, those statistics, that story, that constituent’s
story. All of you will have that constituent’s story
to tell. You want to try and be as firm and as persuasive
as one can be and often times that is really difficult. We’ve
had numerous experiences when we have gone in to lobby on
gun control and, you see the moosehead in the member of Congress’s
office and you just think, maybe this is not a good topic
to talk about right now, or he was the NRA Father of the Year.
It’s a problem. But, nonetheless, you know you try and
go and you are trying to be as persuasive and firm as you
can be, without being too abrasive or confrontational and
there are times when you know, "you dance with the one
who brung you." Sometimes you just have to go for it
if a legislator is not quite getting the picture. Know what
the opposition is. On an issue such as why all of you are
here, premature ovarian failure, I don’t necessarily
think that there is a lot of opposition to that issue. So
given that, you may not need to know the objections. On the
other hand, with respect to if you are going in saying that
we need to increase funding for research at the National Institutes
of Health, or in other venues, or on your state level, or
in your community hospitals, there may be folks who will say,
"well, why should I be spending, why should we be spending
dollars on that, when we could be spending dollars on flu
shots for seniors," (and I am not picking on seniors,
I aspire to being a senior very soon), but, you know, you
get that juxtaposition so when feasible know what the objections
are so that you can be on the offense. If you are able and
you can work in coalition and partnerships, that is extremely
important that there is a community that is coming to speak
on a particular issue, that it is not only your issue. You
are bringing, whether it is doctors and nurses and hospitals,
and other support groups to your table, giving that information
and expressing that this is not isolated in your community
but that it is a shared value of your community.
And, finally, one of the things I have found, in almost twenty
years of being in Washington, DC, a lot of members, especially
on the federal level, really are children and they like to
be thanked for something really good that they did, even if
it is a stretch, and usually it is a stretch But if you can
go in and say, "You know, that was really a great thing
on such and such, and I am really pleased," and then
go in and give your message, that is most helpful. It gives
the sense that you really are not just focused on why you
are there, but you really are an engaged citizen.
I want to shift gears a little bit and talk about the media
as an additive tool. We are bombarded with any of a number
of things such as TV and radio and the media is an extraordinarily
powerful tool. It is also a very expensive tool, but it is
very powerful. The media provides us a lot of really important
venues, whether it is the television, radio, cable. A lot
of the cable networks have public access and you can utilize
public access. Or you can visit your editorial board of the
newspaper. Just thinking about, sort of narrowly, the inside
the beltway approach to things, members of Congress here read
their hometown paper, they read the Washington Post, and the
New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. The last 3 are
tough markets to get into, but their hometown newspaper from
whence many of you may come is a lot easier and we do definitely
urge you to meet with editorial boards, to write letters to
the editor.
|